Lawyers and judicial independence at risk in Colombia
Who we wrote to
We’ve written to:
- the inter-American rapporteur on freedom of expression
- the inter-American rapporteur on the rights of human rights defenders and justice operators
- the UN special rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers
- the UN special rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders
- the UN special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
We wrote jointly with:
- Bar Human Rights Committee of England and Wales
- Lawyers for Lawyers
- Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada
- Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE)
- Institute for the Rule of Law of the International Association of Lawyers (UIA-IROL)
What’s the issue
We’re concerned about the recent threats received by the lawyer Reinaldo Villalba Vargas and his legal team from the Colectivo Jose Alvear Restrepo in Colombia.
Mr Villalba has received multiple messages threats against his life via social media. For example, a message sent via Twitter stated: “we will see you in the street or in the mountains”, a clear reference to a potential attack on him. These threats appear to be related to his professional work as the legal representative of Colombian senator Ivan Cepeda Castro.
Mr Cepeda is a civil party and victim in the criminal case against the former president of Colombia, Mr Uribe, for alleged offences of bribing witnesses and fraud.
The current president of Colombia has made several public statements regarding the criminal case brought against Mr Uribe to the effect that he wishes Mr Uribe to be released. These public statements are contrary to the principle of judicial independence.
The president has stated that he made those statements in a personal capacity and that he, as any citizen, has a right to freedom of expression. Nevertheless, some statements were made via the Twitter account of the Presidency of Colombia.
In accordance with international human rights law, certain caveats apply regarding the exercise of the right to freedom of expression by high officials due to the nature and power of their office and the consequences that such statements may have.
The increasing threats against Mr Villalba, his legal team and his client, as well as the continuing public statements by the current president of Colombia and other high officials about the case against Mr Uribe, undermine judicial independence and contribute to a growing climate of hostility against members of the legal profession.
It’s therefore of the utmost importance and urgency that the international community expresses its full support for the lawyers and judges involved in this case so that they can continue to exercise their professional duties with integrity and without undue external interference.
We’ll continue to monitor the situation of Mr Villalba, his legal team and his client, as well as judicial independence in Colombia.
What we asked for
We called for interventions to request that the Colombian authorities:
- make sure that Mr Villalba and the legal team working on this case can carry out their professional duties without undue external interference, intimidation or harassment
- provide adequate protection – without delay – to safeguard the life, physical and psychological integrity of Mr Villalba, his legal team and his client in consultation with them
- ensure that those responsible for threats made against Mr Villalba, his legal team and his client are brought to justice in proceedings that respect international fair trial standards
- abstain from making public statements about Mr Villalba, his legal team, his client, and the judiciary that interfere with their respective professional duties and with judicial independence
- make sure that judicial independence is respected, as well as the separation of powers, so that the rule of law in Colombia is protected
- ensure compliance with all Colombia’s international legal obligations, specifically the right to life, the right to freedom from torture and ill-treatment, the right to a fair trial and, most notably, the right to an independent and impartial tribunal
Timeline
2012 – the former president of Colombia, Mr Uribe Velez, denounced Mr Cepeda before the Supreme Court because of alleged offences of fraud and abuse of a public function
2018 – the Supreme Court concluded that there were no grounds to open a criminal investigation into Mr Cepeda’s activities
16 February 2018 – the Supreme Court opened a criminal investigation into Mr Uribe for alleged offences of bribing witnesses and fraud, in which Mr Cepeda is a civil party and victim. Mr Villalba is representing Mr Cepada and has received threats
3 August 2020 – the presidents of all the High Courts of Colombia – the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court, the Council of State, the Council of the Judiciary, and the Special Jurisdiction for Peace – issued an unprecedented joint statement insisting on the independence of the judiciary
4 August 2020 – the Supreme Court ordered Mr Uribe’s house arrest