Westminster update: new…
Your weekly update from the Law Society’s public affairs team on all the latest developments and debates in Parliament and across Whitehall.
With all major political parties holding their annual party conferences soon, we are hosting various events with prominent political stakeholders to promote solicitors and the wider profession:
If you’re planning to attend party conference, or will be nearby, get in touch and join us!
Wednesday 11 September saw the election of the new chairs of the Commons’ select committees.
These committees mirror government departments and run inquiries and evidence sessions to explore topical issues and hold ministers to account.
With so many new MPs, there was a battle between longserving members and fresh faces keen to make their mark.
In the end, it was the experienced MPs who came out on top.
While we now have all the chairs confirmed, it won’t be until October that the remaining spaces on all select committees are filled and inquiries can begin.
The Justice Committee is likely to begin looking at prisons and court backlogs, while business and trade will focus on industrial strategy and the Post Office Horizon scandal.
On Tuesday 10 September, Conservative MPs gathered once again to vote on the five remaining candidates in the leadership election.
All eyes were on where the votes initially cast for the eliminated Dame Priti Patel MP would now land:
The majority of Patel's vote shifted to the two other candidates from the right of the party, but with Mel Stride's supporters likely to hail from the more moderate wing, it will be interesting to see whether Tugendhat or Cleverley can pick up votes and close the gap on Jenrick and Badenoch.
The four remaining candidates will now give their pitch to members at the Conservative Party Conference from 29 September to 2 October.
Two final ballots of Conservative MPs on 9 and 10 of October will whittle the shortlist down to the final two.
The final two will then go to a ballot of the party membership to decide who will be the next leader of the Conservative Party and the new leader of the opposition.
On Tuesday 10 September, MPs used justice questions in the House of Commons to raise the crisis in prisons, backlogs in the courts and crisis in legal aid.
Shadow lord chancellor Ed Argar questioned the lord chancellor on how many domestic abusers could be released under the government’s early release scheme.
The lord chancellor, Shabana Mahmood, responded that every step was being taken to exclude domestic abusers from release.
She also criticised Argar for being part of the government that had overseen the start of the prisons crisis.
Turning to the courts backlog, Liberal Democrat MP Steffan Aquarone asked about plans by the government to cap judicial sitting days, which will lead to a loss of 2,000 sitting days across the year.
Justice minister Heidi Alexander said justice is not “immune from the state of public finances.”
Labour MPs Steve Darling and Jonathan Brash both asked for courts in their constituencies to be reopened to help address the backlog, with the minister saying she would meet with both to discuss this.
Labour MP Henry Tufnell highlighted that his constituency is a legal aid desert and asked what is being done by the government to address this.
Alexander praised the role of technology in facilitating access to justice but agreed more needed to be done.
On Wednesday 11 September, the Arbitration Bill completed its committee stage in the Lords.
It will now move to report stage before heading to the Commons.
Only four amendments were tabled to the bill, two being technical drafting corrections from the minister Lord Ponsonby and two on combatting corruption from Lord Hacking (Labour).
During the passage of the previous version of the bill, the then-justice minister Lord Bellamy (Conservative) asked the Law Society and other sector stakeholders a set of questions regarding corruption in the arbitration process.
Our response was mentioned in the debate and was used by the new minister when explaining why he believed Lord Hacking’s amendments were unnecessary.
Lord Ponsonby set out the government’s position in relation to corruption in arbitration, noting that “our framework already provides a robust regime and that no law reform is necessary. A tribunal, like a court, must always guard against fraud and corruption.”
We will continue to brief and monitor the progression of this bill when parliament returns in October.
We are working closely with MPs and peers to influence a number of bills before Parliament:
Read our recently published international data insights report.
We examine the performance of the UK’s main dispute resolution centres, compare them to our global rivals and showcase how the value of UK legal services internationally continues to rise.